Forthcoming

Predictive Value of Knee Flexion at Hospital Discharge for 6-Month Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study

Authors

  • Gonrada Phuangphay, BSc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-0848
  • Chantanee Ninlerd, BSc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-9348
  • Chutikarn Amornsupak, BSc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Sangarun Dungkong, BSc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5292-1720
  • Rapeepat Narkbunnam, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3564-1700
  • Nichakorn Khomawut, BSc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-2026-0318

Keywords:

Total Knee Arthroplasty, range of motion, discharge criteria, predictive value, rehabilitation timing

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether discharge knee flexion <90° after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) predicts 6-month functional outcomes and how postoperative ROM association with final outcomes evolves.

Methods: In this single-center prospective cohort, 216 of 300 patients (72.0%; mean age 68.9 years, 87.0% women) completed 6-month follow-up after primary TKA and were classified by discharge ROM as <90° (n=32) or ≥90° (n=184). ROM was measured preoperatively, at discharge, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was 6-month knee flexion ROM. Secondary analyses examined the association between ROM at different postoperative time points and final ROM outcomes. Functional outcomes included the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Results: Six-month ROM (116.4±9.7° vs 119.0±7.0°, p=0.152), KSS (94.9±5.7 vs 96.2±7.4, p=0.280), and OKS (38.3±4.8 vs 38.3±5.7, p=0.996) were similar between the <90° and ≥90° groups, and all patients reached ≥90° flexion. Discharge ROM weakly predicted 6-month ROM (R²=0.026), whereas 3-month ROM was strongly associated with 6-month ROM (R²=0.591, β=0.643, 95% CI 0.564–0.722). In multivariable regression adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, preoperative ROM independently predicted 6-month ROM (p<0.001), discharge ROM group did not (p=0.149).

Conclusions: Discharge ROM <90° did not predict poor 6-month outcomes. Among the time points assessed, 3-month ROM was the strongest predictor of 6-month ROM and may be a useful time point for prognostication.

References

Bade MJ, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Outcomes before and after total knee arthroplasty compared to healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:559-67.

Bade MJ, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Early high-intensity rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:932-41.

Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, et al. Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:2604-11.

Fitzsimmons SE, Vazquez EA, Bronson MJ. How to treat the stiff total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1096-106.

Holm B, Kristensen MT, Bencke J, et al. Loss of knee-extension strength is related to knee swelling after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1770-6.

Issa K, Banerjee S, Kester MA, et al. The effect of timing of manipulation under anesthesia to improve range of motion and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1349-57.

Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2005;23:1083-90.

Naylor JM, Ko V, Rougellis S, et al. Is discharge knee range of motion a useful and relevant clinical indicator after total knee replacement? Part 2. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:652-8.

NIH Consensus Panel. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement. December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1328-35.

Pozzi F, Snyder-Mackler L, Zeni J. Physical exercise after knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of controlled trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013;49:877-92.

Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet 2018;392:1672-82.

Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, et al. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1278-85.

Rodríguez-Merchán EC. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes, treatment modalities and results. EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:602-10.

Scranton PE Jr. Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:428-35.

Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, et al. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020-2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol 2019;46:1134-40.

Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C, et al. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee 2006;13:111-7.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

1.
Phuangphay G, Ninlerd C, Amornsupak C, Dungkong S, Narkbunnam R, Khomawut N. Predictive Value of Knee Flexion at Hospital Discharge for 6-Month Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study. JseaOrtho [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 14 [cited 2026 Oct. 15];. Available from: https://jseaortho.org/index.php/jsao/article/view/318

Issue

2026: Online First

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 The Royal College of Orthopaedic Surgeons of Thailand

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.