Outcome Measurements Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Keywords:
Total knee arthroplasty, osteoarthritis, outcome measurementsAbstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a definite surgical treatment for late stage knee osteoarthritis. Currently, there are several outcome measurements following TKA which evaluate clinical signs and symptoms, functional activities, and postoperative radiographs. Patient-based evaluation with disease-specific assessment is simple while it provides good validity and reliability. Regarding patient-based evaluations with general health assessment, the short-form health survey (SF)-12 is less time consuming than the SF-36, while providing similar validity and reliability. Although the surgeon-based evaluation is still commonly used in outcome measurement following TKA, it has less responsiveness on the function subscale. Functional performance-based evaluation may not be a sufficient measurement at the immediate-term (< 3 months) follow up, as studies have shown poor improved function performance. However, to perform functional performance[1]based evaluation, the time-up-and-go test or 30-s chair stand test for performance functional-based evaluation are reliable and less time consuming assessments. On the other hand, the immediate post-surgery use of the 6- minute walk distance is somewhat questionable, as it takes a long evaluation time which may cause the patient to become exhausted.
Metrics
References
Hamilton D, Henderson GR, Gaston P, et al. Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Postgrad Med J. 2012;88:627-631.
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468: 57- 63.
Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:262-267.
Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.
Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, et al. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002525.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89A: 780.
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80B:63-69.
Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, et al. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ 1992; 305:1074-1077.
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15: 1833-1840.
Gandek B. Measurement Properties of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: A Systematic Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67:216-229.
Papathanasiou G, Stasi S, Oikonomou L, et al. Clinimetric properties of WOMAC index in Greek knee osteoarthritis patients: comparisons with both self reported and physical performance measures. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35:115- 123.
Jenny JY, Diesinger Y. The Oxford Knee Score: compared performance before and after knee replacement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:409-412.
Jacobs CA, Christensen CP. Correlations between knee society function scores and functional force measures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467: 2414-2419.
Giesinger JM, Kuster MS, Behrend H, et al. Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:64.
Pollard B, Johnson M, Dieppe P. What do osteoarthritis health outcome instruments measure? Impairment, activity limitation, or participation restriction? J Rheumatol 2005;33: 757-763.
Kantz ME, Harris WJ, Levitsky K, et al. Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care. 1992 ;30:MS240-252.
Ko Y, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, et al. Rasch analysis of the Oxford Knee Score. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:1163- 1169.
Ko Y, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, et al. Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in patients undergoing total knee replacement. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:2455-2459.
Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:88-96.
Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:17.
Tegner Y and Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 198:43-49.
Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, et al. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:890-897.
Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, et al. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 ;79:575-582.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourn CD. The MOS 36- item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483.
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12- Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.
Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:337-343.
Fransen M, Edmonds J. Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:807-813.
Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228–241.
Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, et al. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:890-895.
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.
Giles R. Scuderi MD, Robert B. The New Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470:3–19.
Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, et al. Development of a New Knee Society Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:20-32.
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, et al. Measurement properties of performance based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:1548-1562.
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1042- 1052.
Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999;70:113- 119.
Gill S, McBurney H. Reliability of performance-based measures in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13:141-152.
Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, et al. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6:3.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39: 142-148.
Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, et al. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284: 1607- 1608.
Jakobsen TL, Kehlet H, Bandholm T. Reliability of the 6-min walk test after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2625-2628.
Ouellet D, Moffet H. Locomotor deficits before and two months after knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47:484-493.
Ko V, Naylor JM, Harris IA, et al. The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 ;14:145.
Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, et al. Relationship between self-reportd and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population. Clin Rheumatol 2009;28: 253-257.
Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Maly MR, Macintyre NJ. Quantifying self-report measures' overestimation of mobility scores postarthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1288-1296.
Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Clements KE, et al. Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments: a longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:728- 737.
Medalla GA, Moonot P, Peel T, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Cost-benefit comparison of the Oxford Knee score and the American Knee Society score in measuring outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:652- 656.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Royal College of Orthopaedic Surgeons of Thailand
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.