Seating of the Femoral Stem after Washing versus Un-washing the Femoral Canal in Cementless Short Stem Hip Arthroplasty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-2024-0225Keywords:
Total hip arthroplasty, Short stem, Rasp, Wash, Seating, MethaAbstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of washing the femoral canal on the seating of the short femoral stem in cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty.
Methods: This single-center randomized controlled trial included 50 patients divided into unwashed and washed groups. All patients underwent cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty with the Metha® short-stem. The primary outcome measured was the discrepancy between the final rasp and implanted stem, with a mismatch of >2 mm considered clinically significant. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative factors associated with a significant mismatch. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to a clinically significant mismatch between the final rasp and implant. The subsidence and revision were recorded at 4 years follow-up.
Results: The study found that 44% of the cases in the unwashed group had a clinically significant mismatch, compared with 8% in the washed group (P=0.001). The mean discrepancy was 2.4 mm in the unwashed group and 1.2 mm in the washed group (P<0.001). Univariate regression analysis indicated that not washing the canal was associated with a higher rate of significant mismatches (odds ratio [OR]=9.05, P=0.009). No cases of stem subsidence or revision were observed at 4 years follow-up in either group.
Conclusions: Washing the femoral canal with saline significantly reduced the discrepancy between the final rasp and the implant in cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty, potentially improving surgical outcomes and reducing leg length discrepancies.
Metrics
References
Bragdon CR, Burke D, Lowenstein JD, et al. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:945-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80136-7
Budde S, Floerkemeier T, Thorey F, et al. A short-stem hip implant with metaphyseal anchorage in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Technol Health Care 2016;24:559-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-161151
Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Jaffe WL, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components: 15-year minimum follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:75-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000246534.44629.b2
Dalton JE, Cook SD, Thomas KA, et al. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:97-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199501000-00012
Delaunay C. Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on the radio-clinical results of a grit-blasted titanium alloy femoral taper. A case-control study of 198 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with the Alloclassic™ system. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014;100:739-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.010
Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of the proximal femur. Bone 1993;14:231-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2
Feyen H, Shimmin AJ. Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement?. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:442-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33036
Husseini A, Nooh A, Tanzer D, et al. Washing the femoral canal results in more predictable seating of a short tapered femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3220-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.047
Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, et al. Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1742-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00780
Kim YH. Long-term results of the cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:623-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15554
Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of a prospective and consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:538-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90074-8
Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, et al. Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:943-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3354-3
Patel RM, Stulberg SD. The rationale for short uncemented stems in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2014;45:19-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.08.007
Pellegrini VD. Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem. A contemporary broach-only cementless hip stem: surgical tips and pearls. University of Maryland School of Medicine DePuy data, 2009.
Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(208):108-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198607000-00023
Sculco PK, Cottino U, Abdel MP, et al. Avoiding hip instability and limb length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2016;47:327-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.006
Simank HG, Greiner R. Clinical and radiographic short to midterm results with the short hip stem prosthesis “Metha” in 120 cases. J Orthopaedics 2010;7:4-8.
Stulberg SD, Patel RM. The short stem: promises and pitfalls. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):57-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32936
Suksathien Y, Chuvanichanon P, Tippimanchai T, et al. Insufficient lateral stem contact is an influencing factor for significant subsidence in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2022;13:444-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i5.444
Suksathien Y, Suarjui J, Ruangboon C, et al. Mid-term results of short versus conventional cementless femoral stems in patients with bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022;32:47-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02924-2
Suksathien Y, Sueajui J. Mid-term results of short stem total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Hip Int 2019;29:603-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018816011
Tippimanchai T, Suksathien Y, Suksathien R. Patient reported outcomes in short stem total hip arthroplasty. Thai J Orthop Surg 2022:44:26-34.
Vail T, Channer M, Glisson R. The effect of bone cavity preparation method on implant fixation. Proceeding for the 46th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society; 2000 March 12-15; Orlando, Florida.
Yu L, Clark JG, Dai QG, et al. Improving initial mechanical fixation of a porous-coated femoral stem by a cancellous bone compaction method. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1999;24:863.
Zampelis V, Flivik G, Kesteris U. No effect of femoral canal jet-lavage on the stability of cementless stems in primary hip arthroplasty: a randomised RSA study with 6 years follow-up. Hip Int 2020;30:417-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700019843123
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Royal College of Orthopaedic Surgeons of Thailand
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
