Forthcoming

Seating of the Femoral Stem after Washing versus Un-washing the Femoral Canal in Cementless Short Stem Hip Arthroplasty

Authors

  • Thanut Tippimanchai, MD Department of Orthopaedics, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
  • Yingyong Suksathien, MD Department of Orthopaedics, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
  • Jithayut Sueajui, MD Department of Orthopaedics, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-2024-0225

Keywords:

Total hip arthroplasty, Short stem, Rasp, Wash, Seating, Metha

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of washing the femoral canal on the seating of the short femoral stem in cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty.

Methods: This single-center randomized controlled trial included 50 patients divided into unwashed and washed groups. All patients underwent cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty with the Metha® short-stem. The primary outcome measured was the discrepancy between the final rasp and implanted stem, with a mismatch of >2 mm considered clinically significant. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative factors associated with a significant mismatch. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to a clinically significant mismatch between the final rasp and implant. The subsidence and revision were recorded at 4 years follow-up.

Results: The study found that 44% of the cases in the unwashed group had a clinically significant mismatch, compared with 8% in the washed group (P=0.001). The mean discrepancy was 2.4 mm in the unwashed group and 1.2 mm in the washed group (P<0.001). Univariate regression analysis indicated that not washing the canal was associated with a higher rate of significant mismatches (odds ratio [OR]=9.05, P=0.009). No cases of stem subsidence or revision were observed at 4 years follow-up in either group.

Conclusions: Washing the femoral canal with saline significantly reduced the discrepancy between the final rasp and the implant in cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty, potentially improving surgical outcomes and reducing leg length discrepancies.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bragdon CR, Burke D, Lowenstein JD, et al. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:945-51.

Budde S, Floerkemeier T, Thorey F, et al. A short-stem hip implant with metaphyseal anchorage in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Technol Health Care 2016;24:559-69.

Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Jaffe WL, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components: 15-year minimum follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:75-80.

Dalton JE, Cook SD, Thomas KA, et al. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:97-110.

Delaunay C. Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on the radio-clinical results of a grit-blasted titanium alloy femoral taper. A case-control study of 198 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with the Alloclassic™ system. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014;100:739-44.

Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of the proximal femur. Bone 1993;14:231-42.

Feyen H, Shimmin AJ. Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement?. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:442-8.

Husseini A, Nooh A, Tanzer D, et al. Washing the femoral canal results in more predictable seating of a short tapered femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3220-5.

Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, et al. Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1742-52.

Kim YH. Long-term results of the cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:623-7.

Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of a prospective and consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:538-48.

Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, et al. Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:943-50.

Patel RM, Stulberg SD. The rationale for short uncemented stems in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2014;45:19-31.

Pellegrini VD. Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem. A contemporary broach-only cementless hip stem: surgical tips and pearls. University of Maryland School of Medicine DePuy data, 2009.

Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(208):108-13.

Sculco PK, Cottino U, Abdel MP, et al. Avoiding hip instability and limb length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2016;47:327-34.

Simank HG, Greiner R. Clinical and radiographic short to midterm results with the short hip stem prosthesis “Metha” in 120 cases. J Orthopaedics 2010;7:4-8.

Stulberg SD, Patel RM. The short stem: promises and pitfalls. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):57-62.

Suksathien Y, Chuvanichanon P, Tippimanchai T, et al. Insufficient lateral stem contact is an influencing factor for significant subsidence in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2022;13:444-53.

Suksathien Y, Suarjui J, Ruangboon C, et al. Mid-term results of short versus conventional cementless femoral stems in patients with bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022;32:47-53.

Suksathien Y, Sueajui J. Mid-term results of short stem total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Hip Int 2019;29:603-8.

Tippimanchai T, Suksathien Y, Suksathien R. Patient reported outcomes in short stem total hip arthroplasty. Thai J Orthop Surg 2022:44:26-34.

Vail T, Channer M, Glisson R. The effect of bone cavity preparation method on implant fixation. Proceeding for the 46th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society; 2000 March 12-15; Orlando, Florida.

Yu L, Clark JG, Dai QG, et al. Improving initial mechanical fixation of a porous-coated femoral stem by a cancellous bone compaction method. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1999;24:863.

Zampelis V, Flivik G, Kesteris U. No effect of femoral canal jet-lavage on the stability of cementless stems in primary hip arthroplasty: a randomised RSA study with 6 years follow-up. Hip Int 2020;30:417-22.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-11

How to Cite

1.
Tippimanchai T, Suksathien Y, Sueajui J. Seating of the Femoral Stem after Washing versus Un-washing the Femoral Canal in Cementless Short Stem Hip Arthroplasty. JseaOrtho [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 11 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];. Available from: https://jseaortho.org/index.php/jsao/article/view/225

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)